<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>ISEdb.COM &#187; Ross Dunn</title>
	<atom:link href="http://isedb.com/author/rossdunn/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://isedb.com</link>
	<description>Where Search Engines, Social Networking, and Internet Marketing Happen!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 12:02:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Images are the Natural Evolution of Search</title>
		<link>http://isedb.com/20080313-1812.php</link>
		<comments>http://isedb.com/20080313-1812.php#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 14:25:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ross Dunn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Search Engine Optimization]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.isedb.com/wp/?page_id=1812</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Over the past couple years it has been impossible to avoid the buzz
about images and their increasing role in search; such as universal
search which is becoming commonplace among the major search engines.
But universal search is only the most prevalent news and only the
baby-steps of <span>a new format of search that is about to take over the Internet.</span>
Do I have your interest piqued? I will now lay the foundation of my
statement to hopefully get you as excited as I am about this
unstoppable search evolution. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Over the past couple years it has been impossible to avoid the buzz<br />
about images and their increasing role in search; such as universal<br />
search which is becoming commonplace among the major search engines.<br />
But universal search is only the most prevalent news and only the<br />
baby-steps of <span>a new format of search that is about to take over the Internet.</span><br />
Do I have your interest piqued? I will now lay the foundation of my<br />
statement to hopefully get you as excited as I am about this<br />
unstoppable search evolution.<br/><br/><span style="font-weight: bold;">Evidence 1) Photosynth</span><br/>If you have any technology mavens as friends it is likely you saw <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s-DqZ8jAmv0">this incredible video</a> presented by Microsoft at the TED conference last year discussing Photosynth. To quote <a href="http://labs.live.com/photosynth/" target="_blank">Microsoft Lab&#8217;s Photosynth home page</a> this software<br/><br />
<blockquote>&#8220;<span>takes<br />
a large collection of photos of a place or an object, analyzes them for<br />
similarities, and then displays the photos in a reconstructed <b>three-dimensional space</b>, showing you how each one relates to the next. In our collections, you can access <b>gigabytes</b> of photos in seconds, view a scene from nearly <b>any angle</b>, find similar photos with a single click, and zoom in to make the <b>smallest detail</b> as big as your monitor.&#8221;</span></p></blockquote>
<p><span>My<br />
jaw still hurts from hitting the ground after my first viewing of<br />
Photosynth many months ago. This software made a massive impression on<br />
me that has led me to many interesting ideas on the applications for<br />
this software; I will leave these thoughts to another time. For now,<br />
however, lets just say that the advent of a technology such as<br />
Photosynth provided a first glimpse into how images on the web can play<br />
a far greater role than ever imagined.<br/><br/></span><span><span style="font-weight: bold;">Evidence 2) PicLens by cooliris</span><br/><a href="http://www.piclens.com/" target="_blank">PicLens</a><br />
is a fantastic plugin that allows searchers to navigate a 3d gallery of<br />
images associated with the topic they are searching. The user can also<br />
surf related images by simply clicking on a small play icon that<br />
appears on images anywhere in their browser (the icon appears on the<br />
image when the user&#8217;s mouse hovers over it for a moment). So where does<br />
PicLens get its content from? PicLens has complete access to the image<br />
caches of: Google, Yahoo, Flickr, SmugMug, Photobucket and DeviantArt.<br/><br/>This free, incredibly useful software <a href="http://www.piclens.com/" target="_blank">is available now</a><br />
and it represents a new way for the masses to think about search;<br />
instead of showing information in a ranking format, PicLens makes<br />
browsing images as simple as a flick of your mouse (momentum will<br />
actually allow the images to move by). Right now PicLens is naturally<br />
designed for images but who says it needs to stay that way?<br/><br/><img title="" alt="" src="http://www.isedb.com/db/content_images/1/searchme-logo.jpg" align="right" border="0" height="49" hspace="10" vspace="5" width="222"/><span style="font-weight: bold;">Evidence 3) SearchMe</span><br/>When my colleague showed me the preview of <a href="http://www.searchme.com/" target="_blank">SearchMe</a><br />
I knew I had the linchpin for this very article. SearchMe is a new<br />
search engine in private Beta at the moment but this next generation<br />
search engine has finally married image search in a manner that will<br />
get many tongues wagging.<br/><br/>As the video below outlines in detail<br />
SearchMe allows searchers to type in a search and then define the<br />
intended topic of their search in order to provide the most relevant<br />
results. Once the user selects their topic they are provided with a<br />
slick but simple page showing pictures of each resulting web page that<br />
can be scanned through in a manner similar to PicLens.<br/><br/><br/></span><br />
<span>Now these are not images in a classic sense,<br />
since they are actually just screenshots of the existing web pages,<br />
however, the technology is extremely similar and it seems natural that<br />
the final version of SearchMe&#8217;s image search option would utilize the<br />
same technology.<br/><br/><span style="font-weight: bold;">Tying it all Together</span><br/>What<br />
is the one thing that all of these concepts have in common? The answer<br />
is marvelously simple; they all focus on the simple concept that a<br />
picture is worth a thousand words. Why show a snippet of content in a<br />
search engine result page when a complete image could say so much more<br />
about the destination?<br/><br/><span style="font-weight: bold;">Are You Excited Yet?</span><br/></span><span>So<br />
are we on the same page now? Are you as fascinated as I am with the<br />
next generation of search? If not, you had better get on board quickly;<br />
there is no doubt in my mind that image-based searching is the natural<br />
evolution of search. Don&#8217;t get me wrong, on page content will still<br />
play a large role in algorithms but the days of top 10 results are<br />
numbered.</span><br/><span><br/><span style="font-weight: bold;">What Will this Mean to SEO?</span><br/>Basically a few existing elements of search engine optimization will become more important:<br/></span>
<ol>
<li>Web<br />
pages will have to be designed with a tighter focus on usability and<br />
simplicity for screenshots to appear interesting/relevant enough to<br />
click on.</li>
<li>Images will always need to be appropriately tagged and described.</li>
<li>Web<br />
site images will have to be picked with more care from stock<br />
photography sites in order to capture the eyes of image-surfing<br />
prospects.</li>
<li>SEOs will find it useful to include sales-oriented information in images but not at the expense of the image.</li>
<li>Content<br />
around images and the overall page text must be extremely relevant to<br />
the image and the description and tags that are attributed to it.</li>
</ol>
<p>In<br />
short, the evolution of search will continue to do what it has always<br />
done; make us all work harder to provide better quality content. One<br />
thing is for certain&#8230; the evolution of search just makes search engine optimization services more interesting and necessary in order to maintain search success in multiple search environments.<br/></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://isedb.com/20080313-1812.php/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Apparently ASK Doesn&#039;t Always Have the Right Answer</title>
		<link>http://isedb.com/20080310-1810.php</link>
		<comments>http://isedb.com/20080310-1810.php#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 01:37:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ross Dunn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Headline News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.isedb.com/wp/?page_id=1810</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Wall Street Journal <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB120465683155910833.html" target="_blank">broke incredibly sad news</a> [last week]... indeed I think it is one of the saddest moments in my SEO career. <a href="http://www.ask.com/" target="_blank">Ask.com</a>
is letting go of 40 employees and conceptually restructuring itself by
moving away from mainstream search and focusing on question-related
searches for their supposed primary audience "middle-American,
predominantly female consumers." ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today the Wall Street Journal <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB120465683155910833.html" target="_blank">broke incredibly sad news</a> [last week]&#8230; indeed I think it is one of the saddest moments in my SEO career. <a href="http://www.ask.com/" target="_blank">Ask.com</a><br />
is letting go of 40 employees and conceptually restructuring itself by<br />
moving away from mainstream search and focusing on question-related<br />
searches for their supposed primary audience &#8220;middle-American,<br />
predominantly female consumers.&#8221;<br/><br/><a href="http://www.ask.com/" target="_blank">Ask.com</a> is letting go<br />
of 40 employees and conceptually restructuring itself by moving away<br />
from mainstream search and focusing on question-related searches for<br />
their supposed primary audience &#8220;middle-American, predominantly female<br />
consumers.&#8221;<br/><br/>Now this may just seem like yet another change of direction at Ask (they are fans of change) but the fact that <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gary_Price" target="_blank">Ask maven Gary Price</a><br />
was let go made it clear that Ask is no longer interested in competing<br />
with the likes of Google or Microhoo (a popular nod to the impending<br />
doom that is Microsoft buying Yahoo).<br/><br/>So what does this mean to<br />
you and me? Well first, me ;-) I am feeling mighty upset. I was so<br />
upset that I went and took down the painted Ask logo we have in the<br />
StepForth office proudly espousing Ask as a favorite search engine&#8230; a<br />
sad day indeed (see picture).<br/><br/>I along with many of my industry<br />
peers had high hopes for Ask. Coincidentally, just last week I took the<br />
Director of Public Relations at Ask, <a href="http://about.ask.com/en/docs/about/contact_us.shtml" target="_blank">Patrick Crisp</a>,<br />
aside at SMX West and told him how interested I was in working with Ask<br />
to help its profile in anyway possible. I was confident in their<br />
platform and told him what I felt was needed to make Ask a far better<br />
contender in the search market; a larger database, more frequent<br />
indexing, and a face in the industry with a presence similar to Matt<br />
Cutts.<br/><br/>So enough about my pain, what will this mean for you?<br />
Less choice! Just consider this for a second&#8230; when Microsoft buys<br />
Yahoo there will only be 2 search engines controlling the majority of<br />
the marketplace. Startlingly, I don&#8217;t even think I know of a single<br />
fledgling search engine that has a chance of filling any new void<br />
should one appear. Now don&#8217;t get me wrong, I fully expect something<br />
will popup to take advantage of the vacuum that Ask is likely to leave;<br />
after all I don&#8217;t expect Ask&#8217;s freshly embraced target market will<br />
allow it to expand much past it&#8217;s 4% search share.<br/><br/>One<br />
possible contender in the future of search that comes to mind is<br />
currently vapor as far as we all know (because it is not even in public<br />
Beta yet) but it certainly has brains behind it &#8211; that is <a href="http://www.cuill.com/" target="_blank">Cuill</a> (pronounced &#8220;Cool&#8221;). According to one of the keynotes at SMX West by <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Louis_Monier" target="_blank">Louis Monier</a><br />
(Vice President of Products at Cuill, founder of Alta Vista, and past<br />
Google employee), Cuill is attempting to change the way we search to<br />
provide a far more robust and comprehensive search result. I should<br />
qualify that Mr. Monier was careful never to even mention Cuill in his<br />
speech but considering his current affiliation it seems obvious that<br />
Cuill is meant to provide a new innovative search medium. The speech<br />
was a long one with many interesting facets but what stood out was Mr.<br />
Monier&#8217;s heartfelt expression of the inherent inadequacy of 10 listings<br />
per search result page; he was right, that is simply not effective<br />
anymore with the growth of the Internet what it is.<br/><br/>Prospective<br />
contenders aside, Ask&#8217;s new management has made a decision to give up<br />
the fight for mainstream search and I along with many of my colleagues<br />
are disheartened; we really had hope for this brilliant underdog. I<br />
even wrote an article on <a href="http://www.isedb.com/db/articles/1724/1/How-to-Optimize-for-Ask/Page1.html">how to optimize for Ask.com</a> which I suppose is now bereft of purpose.<br/><br/>Special thanks to <a href="http://searchengineland.com/080304-145509.php" target="_blank">Search Engine Land</a> who brought this to my attention and has more info on this debacle.<br/></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://isedb.com/20080310-1810.php/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How to Troubleshoot Dropped Search Engine Rankings</title>
		<link>http://isedb.com/20080115-1768.php</link>
		<comments>http://isedb.com/20080115-1768.php#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 01:04:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ross Dunn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Search Engine Optimization]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.isedb.com/wp/?page_id=1768</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Are you baffled about a recent drop in your search engine rankings? Do
you know where to start and get a handle on what the problem might be
and how to remedy it? ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are you baffled about a recent drop in your search engine rankings? Do<br />
you know where to start and get a handle on what the problem might be<br />
and how to remedy it? One option to consider is using search engine<br />
forums as a resource. They are full of questions from people who have<br />
experienced similar situations and are great resources for an answer or<br />
two. But let&#8217;s say you really want to get to the bottom of the problem<br />
and you want to do it yourself. The following are some of the beginning<br />
steps StepForth takes when evaluating dropped rankings.<br/><br/>
<p><strong>Retrace Your Steps</strong><br/><br/>Write<br />
a list of everything that anyone has done to your site within the past<br />
3 weeks. Now look for anything that could have negatively impacted your<br />
content, site structure, or the reliability of your URLs. Once you<br />
write down the course of events the answer might pop right out at you.<br />
Here are some common situational culprits:<br/></p>
<ul type="disc">
<li>You<br />
just moved your website to a different hosting provider: did your site<br />
experience much, if any, downtime during the switch over? Quality<br />
hosting companies will allow you to setup your site on their servers<br />
before the switch takes place so that downtime is minimized if not<br />
removed entirely. If a search engine happened to visit your site while<br />
it was down there is a small chance your rankings would be negatively<br />
affected but it will only happen for a short period. Once the search<br />
engine re-indexes your website everything should be back in order.<br/></li>
<p><br/>
<li>The<br />
structure of your site has permanently changed: did you redirect the<br />
traffic from the old URLs to the new URLs using a 301 redirect? If not<br />
then you should. A 301 redirect is a permanent redirect which tells any<br />
visiting search engine to permanently change its index to reflect the<br />
new site structure.<br/></li>
<p><br/>
<li>Contact your hosting company to<br />
check if your server has had any downtime recently. In most cases<br />
search engines will not drop your rankings if they visit your site and<br />
it is offline once; however, if this happens consistently then your<br />
rankings can fail. If your hosting company states that downtime has<br />
occurred then you have at least one possible answer for your ranking<br />
woes. As long as your site is now reliably online and has not been<br />
offline for an extended period (days or weeks) the rankings should<br />
reappear as your site is re-indexed. There may be a notable drop in<br />
rankings but in most cases they will return to pre-incident status.<br/><br/></li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Check Your Content</strong><br/></p>
<p>
Is all of your textual content up to date? It is amazing just how<br />
quickly a website&#8217;s rankings can drop when someone accidentally<br />
overwrites optimized pages with older, non-optimized pages. Check the<br />
content and if you find old content just overwrite it with the newer<br />
content and wait for the search engines to come back and re-index your<br />
website; Google and Yahoo are likely to come back within a week or even<br />
a day.<br/><br/></p>
<p><strong>Check Your Server Headers</strong><br/><br/>When<br />
a search engine visits your website it must first respond to any<br />
commands provided by your server. These commands are often identifiable<br />
in the server header. As a result, we like to verify that no incorrect,<br />
unusual or unnecessary commands are stashed in the header of your site.<br />
We use the free <a href="http://www.seoconsultants.com/tools/headers.asp" target="_blank">SEO Consultants Check  Server Headers Tool</a> to review any headers and take action if required but <a href="http://www.google.com/search?q=server+header+checker&#038;sourceid=navclient-ff&#038;ie=UTF-8&#038;rls=GGGL,GGGL:2007-36,GGGL:en" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">there  are others</a> freely available as well.<br/><br/></p>
<p><strong>Search Engine Webmaster Tool  Resources</strong><br/><br/>If you have  not already done so I strongly recommend claiming your website on <a href="http://siteexplorer.search.yahoo.com/" target="_blank">Yahoo Site Explorer</a>, <a href="http://www.google.com/webmasters/" target="_blank">Google Webmaster Central</a> and <a href="http://webmaster.live.com/" target="_blank">Live Search Webmaster Center</a>.<br />
Each of these fine resources provides extremely useful feedback (from<br />
each respective search engine&#8217;s perspective) for site owners such as:<br/></p>
<ul type="disc">
<li>Whether your site is currently       banned. If you are, in some cases they will tell you why.</li>
<li>Notes on any impediments the       search engine has experienced when trying to index your website.</li>
<li>Who is linking to your website.</li>
<li>Which pages are the most       popular on your website.</li>
<li>Which keywords lead the most       traffic to your website.</li>
</ul>
<p>In addition  these free webmaster resources allow you to submit an XML sitemap of your website  so that you can ensure no pages are missed when the search engines index your  website.<br/><br/></p>
<p><strong>Search Your Site for SPAM</strong><br/><br/>It<br />
is possible that your site has been &#8220;lucky&#8221; enough not to have been<br />
penalized until now for certain content transgressions. You see, search<br />
engines don&#8217;t always catch SPAM right away. In fact, I occasionally<br />
find myself shaking my head in disbelief when I see blatantly spammy<br />
sites appearing in the top 10 search results. Your site may not be<br />
entirely spammy but all it takes is for one transgression to come to<br />
light for a search engine to penalize your search engine rankings. What<br />
SPAM is and how to identify it is an article unto itself so here are<br />
some helpful resources for you to review:</p>
<ul type="disc">
<li><a href="http://www.isedb.com/db/articles/1345/0/15-Shades-of-SEO-Spam/Page0.html" target="_blank">15       Shades of SEO SPAM</a> by Jim Hedger (written in 2006 but still       applicable)</li>
<p><br/>
<li><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spamdexing" target="_blank">Wikipedia&#8217;s Definition of       SPAM</a> has some great content worth reading as well.<br/><br/></li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Contact an SEO or Request a Forum  Review</strong><br/><br/>If<br />
you haven&#8217;t found a reasonable answer after following the instructions<br />
above I would recommend either contacting a reputable SEO company for<br />
advice or posting your ranking problems publicly on a popular search<br />
marketing forum within a resource like <a href="http://www.webmasterworld.com/" target="_blank">Webmaster World</a>.<br />
There are a lot of people on forums that can be incredibly helpful and<br />
may have an answer for you. But a word to the wise, make sure the<br />
person providing advice has a solid reputation. I strongly recommend<br />
reviewing a number of their previous posts and Googling them to ensure<br />
they have suitable experience to provide advice &#8211; unless of course you<br />
have a &#8216;no duh&#8217; moment where their advice makes perfect sense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://isedb.com/20080115-1768.php/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Your Logfiles May Be Missing Important Data</title>
		<link>http://isedb.com/20071227-1762.php</link>
		<comments>http://isedb.com/20071227-1762.php#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Dec 2007 15:58:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ross Dunn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Web Hosting]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.isedb.com/wp/?page_id=1762</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In this article I am going to explain logfiles and their importance in website analytics from my perspective as a ClickTracks user. ClickTracks can do a lot to determine what is or is not
working on a website; much more than expected in most cases. The one
thing, however, that ClickTracks or any other logfile-based analytics
tool cannot do is interpret information in your logfiles if it is not
recorded. Unfortunately this is a common occurrence and many site
owners have no idea that their hosting company is not saving
information that could help them now or later when they find they need
it.<br/> ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In this article I am going to explain logfiles and their importance in website analytics from my perspective as a <a href="http://www.clicktracks.com/services/certification.php" target="_blank">ClickTracks</a> user. Before I begin, however, I want you to know that although I offer essential analytic consulting, I am a certified <a href="http://www.clicktracks.com/services/certification.php" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">ClickTracks Analytics Professional</a><br />
and have dabbled in books on analytics, I don&#8217;t consider myself to be<br />
an analytics expert. In fact, I constantly find myself humbled by how<br />
much more there is to know. That said, I do know more than the average<br />
site owner and I hope that this article can shine a little light on<br />
this often confusing subject and save you some future headaches.<br/><br/>As many of you may know I am a huge fan of the logfile version of <a href="http://www.clicktracks.com/services/certification.php" target="_blank">ClickTracks Professional</a>,<br />
a website analytics package that I find indispensable for myself and my<br />
clientele. ClickTracks can do a lot to determine what is or is not<br />
working on a website; much more than expected in most cases. The one<br />
thing, however, that ClickTracks or any other logfile-based analytics<br />
tool cannot do is interpret information in your logfiles if it is not<br />
recorded. Unfortunately this is a common occurrence and many site<br />
owners have no idea that their hosting company is not saving<br />
information that could help them now or later when they find they need<br />
it.<br/><br/>The reality is that over ninety percent of the hosting<br />
companies I have dealt with have not been saving the vital data that a<br />
higher level analytics program needs; to work at peak performance if at<br />
all. In this posting I will provide an overview on this issue so you<br />
have enough information to approach your hosting company about making<br />
the required updates to their systems. If you are unsure you can even<br />
refer them to this article and/or the set of questions and details I<br />
provided below.<br/><br/><span style="font-weight: bold;">What is a Logfile?</span><br/>First, let me explain the very basic idea of what a logfile is and how one is created.<br/><br/>Whenever<br />
you visit a website your browser requests information from the server<br />
hosting the website. This request is passed onto the server and in turn<br />
the server delivers the information requested by your browser. Whenever<br />
this exchange takes place your server saves the request along with a<br />
host of information about the requesting browser such as:<br/>
<ul>
<li>    the internet address (loosely connected to location) known as the IP</li>
<li>browser type (Internet Explorer or Firefox or..)</li>
<li>the screen resolution of the browser used</li>
<li>time and date of the request</li>
<li>the page requested for viewing</li>
<li>the website the visitor came from (known as a Referrer)</li>
<li>if applicable, the keyword(s) that were used to find your website on a search engine</li>
<li>etc.<br/></li>
</ul>
<p>Once<br />
this data is collected it is saved on the server in a logfile for later<br />
use and over time it is often overwritten with new data so the files do<br />
not get too large; they bulk up very quickly especially on high-traffic<br />
websites.<br/><br/><span style="font-weight: bold;">How Can Logfiles Help Improve Your Website?</span><br/>Now<br />
that you know what data is collected it is time to explain, in general<br />
terms, how this data can be used to help your website. There is a wide<br />
variety of information that can be gleaned from a complete logfile such<br />
as:<br/>
<ul>
<li>    How long visitors stay at your website or on a particular page.</li>
<li>What pages they visited.</li>
<li>Where visitors are viewing your website from geographically.</li>
<li>What keywords were used to visit your website and which search engines were driving the highest volume and/or quality traffic.</li>
<li>Which pages had the highest or least traffic.</li>
<li>The average time a visitor stays at your website: often a great indication of the &#8216;stickiness&#8217; of your website.</li>
<li>You<br />
can determine the effectiveness of your pay-per-click campaign by<br />
tracking visitors specifically delivered from the campaign.</li>
<li>Identify potential pay-per-click fraud using tools like ClickTracks Professional that has a click fraud reporting tool.</li>
<li>and much more&#8230;<br/></li>
</ul>
<p><span style="font-weight: bold;">So What&#8217;s the Issue?</span><br/>Many<br />
hosting company&#8217;s are smart enough to include a basic web analytics<br />
program with every account. These programs are decent for anyone who<br />
wants to simply find out the traffic to their website and a myriad of<br />
other basic stats. However, there is often a pitfall to these basic<br />
programs. You see in order to save on computer performance the hosting<br />
company usually sets their servers to collect only the minimal data<br />
these basic systems require. As a result, more complex logfile-based<br />
analytics programs may find themselves starved of the data they need to<br />
operate fully. This is where my clients have found themselves before;<br />
they have sub-par logfiles and are forced to try and convince their<br />
hosting company to change their data collection methods to meet more<br />
advanced standards.<br/><br/>If you have no interest in website analytics<br />
you may find this whole scenario to be a non-issue. I completely<br />
understand, however, put yourself a year or even a month down the road<br />
when your website is taking off and you need to know more about the<br />
visitors to your website. You just might find yourself in this same<br />
frustrating scenario and it will seem absolutely insane how hard you<br />
have to push to get this data properly collected. Unfortunately, unless<br />
you are leasing your own private (dedicated) server from the hosting<br />
company they tend to set up their shared servers with only the basic<br />
needs of the majority in mind. As a result, the only way to force<br />
change is if more customers consider it a basic need &#8211; thus the reason<br />
for this article. Help me affect change so that you save yourself a<br />
headache in the future!<br/><br/><span style="font-weight: bold;">How to Be Sure Your Server is Collecting the Right Information</span><br/>Most<br />
of you cannot check your logfiles for completeness with an analytics<br />
program so you will have to trust your server administrators to do<br />
their due diligence based on the following question.<br/><br/>Note: If<br />
you like you can just copy and paste the following question (noted in<br />
red) and send it to your hosting company support staff:<br/><br/><span style="color: rgb(153, 0, 0);">Hello,</span><br/><br/><span style="color: rgb(153, 0, 0);">I<br />
would like to make sure my website&#8217;s logfiles have the necessary<br />
information to run a higher end web analytics program. Is your server<br />
set up to collect the data on my website? I need this data to properly<br />
analyze the traffic on my website.</span><br/>
<ul style="color: rgb(153, 0, 0);">
<li>Date and Time</li>
<li>Client IP Address</li>
<li>HTTP Method</li>
<li>Requested file and Query string</li>
<li>User Agent</li>
<li>Referrer</li>
<li>Status code</li>
<li>Cookie (preferable, but not required)<br/></li>
</ul>
<p><span style="color: rgb(153, 0, 0);">If you are unsure of the answer or you need to set this up then please review the settings that need to be enabled on <a href="http://way.clicktracks.com/help/en/an/index.html?apache.htm" target="_blank">Apache servers</a> or <a href="http://way.clicktracks.com/help/en/an/index.html?configuringiis.htm" target="_blank">Microsoft Internet Information Servers</a>; these pages include instructions if you need them.</span><br/><br/><span style="color: rgb(153, 0, 0);">Sincerely,</span><br/><span style="color: rgb(153, 0, 0);">&lt;&gt;</span><br/><br/><span style="font-weight: bold;"><br/>My Hosting Company Disregarded This as Nonsense</span><br/>I<br />
fully expect some will and that is because many website owners still<br />
care little or nothing about web site statistics so they have not even<br />
used the basic data to its fullest yet &#8211; and hosting company&#8217;s are<br />
aware of this. In fact, a good friend who owns a hosting company<br />
himself guessed around 95% of his website clients never even look at<br />
their stats. This is all true, however, does that mean that important<br />
data should not be collected for those who do want to delve deeper into<br />
analytics? I don&#8217;t believe so and the changes you are requesting will<br />
only increase the size of the logfiles for your website a small amount.<br />
Unless of course you don&#8217;t even have logfiles which is enough for me to<br />
recommend you take your services elsewhere.<br/><br/><span style="font-weight: bold;">Why Not Use Google Analytics Instead?</span><br/>Google<br />
Analytics is an awesome solution for many small businesses. It does not<br />
require logfiles and it takes a marginal amount of work to begin<br />
acquiring proper data. In fact, I think it is a great tool for the<br />
majority of businesses that want to wade into a mid range analytics<br />
solution providing you are comfortable with Google having access to<br />
your stats. That said, there is one MAJOR flaw in using Google<br />
Analytics&#8230; it does not have reliable click fraud reporting. You see<br />
many of my clients use ClickTracks to monitor their pay per click<br />
campaign for click fraud which is not something I would ever trust<br />
Google to police itself on. That does not mean I do not use Google<br />
Analytics. In fact, whenever possible I use both ClickTracks and Google<br />
Analytics in tandem for redundancy especially when certain capabilities<br />
such as cookie tracking are not available from a hosting provider -<br />
Google includes cookies by default.<br/><br/><span style="font-weight: bold;">In Summary</span><br/>Many<br />
website owners have no idea what they will or will not need in the<br />
future to properly administrate their online marketing campaigns. This<br />
article discusses a simple adjustment to the accumulation of website<br />
logfiles that I strongly believe all competent hosting companies should<br />
implement in order to provide scalability for their clientele. The<br />
adjustment will provide the additional information that a competent<br />
analytics solution will need to provide accurate statistics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://isedb.com/20071227-1762.php/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How to Optimize for Ask</title>
		<link>http://isedb.com/20071011-1724.php</link>
		<comments>http://isedb.com/20071011-1724.php#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2007 12:20:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ross Dunn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Search Engine Optimization]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.isedb.com/wp/?page_id=1724</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ask has some incredible and unique features that I believe will slowly
but surely steal search share from its more popular brethren.
Consequently, it seems appropriate to provide some tips on how to
optimize for Ask without sacrificing rankings on the other search
engines.<br/> ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ask&#8217;s  portion of the search market is a mere 4.3% (src. <a href="http://www.hitwise.com/datacenter/searchengineanalysis.php" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">Hitwise</a>)<br />
so it is understandable that optimizing for Ask is a low priority in<br />
the eyes of many webmasters. That said, despite the company&#8217;s rather <a href="http://searchengineland.com/070622-135556.php" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">infamous advertising  campaigns</a><br />
Ask has some incredible and unique features that I believe will slowly<br />
but surely steal search share from its more popular brethren.<br />
Consequently, it seems appropriate to provide some tips on how to<br />
optimize for Ask without sacrificing rankings on the other search<br />
engines. To that end the following instructions are supplementary to<br />
the recommendations provided in my &#8220;<a href="http://www.isedb.com/db/articles/1712/1/How-to-Optimize-for-Yahoo/Page1.html" target="_blank">How  to Optimize for Yahoo</a>&#8221; article. </p>
<p><strong>ASK OVERVIEW</strong></p>
<p>Ask<br />
differs from the other search engines because it has fully rolled-out<br />
universal search. For those of you who are unfamiliar with this term<br />
universal search is the integration of results from a variety of<br />
sources (i.e. images, video, local information, news, blogs, etc.) into<br />
a single results page. Although Google has implemented universal search<br />
to some extent Ask is the first search engine to leap head-first into<br />
these complex waters and they have done a great job of it. Since<br />
universal search is slowly going to be rolled-out across Google, MSN<br />
and Yahoo, Ask is a great place to prepare for the competitive world of<br />
universal search. The areas I will cover are images, blogs and feeds,<br />
local search and mobile.</p>
<p><strong>ASK IMAGE OPTIMIZATION</strong></p>
<p>Just<br />
how do you get an image to show up within Ask.com&#8217;s universal search<br />
results? The key is to remove any doubt of the image&#8217;s relevance to the<br />
keyword you are trying to achieve rankings for.<br/>     </p>
<ol start="1" type="1">
<li>Alt tags need to be       created and must clearly represent the topic of the picture while       utilizing the target keyword.</li>
<p><br/>
<li>The<br />
content nearby the image should be relevant to the picture and for best<br />
results should include the keyword used to describe the picture in the<br />
Alt tag.</li>
<p><br/>
<li>The filename of the       picture should utilize the keyword.</li>
</ol>
<p><br/>
<p><strong>ASK&#8217;S LOCAL SEARCH: ASKCITY</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://city.ask.com/" target="_blank">AskCity</a><br />
is Ask&#8217;s local portal where various maps and locally themed content<br />
(such as event news, theatre tickets, etc.) can be readily found.<br />
AskCity was launched in December 2006 as a far superior upgrade over<br />
Ask Local and it remains a solid leader in the growing and highly<br />
competitive local search marketplace. Fortunately having a presence at<br />
AskCity only requires that your business is added to their database if<br />
it is not already there.</p>
<p><strong>How to Submit Your Business to  AskCity</strong><br/><br/>     Submit  your business information to <a href="mailto:askcitybusiness@help.ask.com">askcitybusiness@help.ask.com</a> with the subject line &#8220;Ask City Feedback &#8211; Business&#8221;. Ensure the following  information is added to the email:<br/>     </p>
<ul type="disc">
<li>Business name and       complete address</li>
<li>Phone number</li>
<li>The category your       business best fits</li>
<li>The website URL</li>
<li>A contact person&#8217;s       email address</li>
</ul>
<p>According  to Ask the turnaround time is no more than 28 days.</p>
<p><strong>Tip!</strong><br />
You might notice that your business profile (once it is online) has a<br />
rating system attached to it; shown as a five star system. If you wish<br />
to influence your rating then I suggest sending your happy customers to<br />
CitySearch, Yelp.com, and Insiderpages where these results are drawn<br />
from. Once they are there have them find your listing and provide a<br />
positive review of your business. <br/></p>
<p><strong>MAXIMIZING VISIBILITY IN ASK BLOGS  &#038; FEEDS</strong></p>
<p>Ask  is the proud owner of <a href="http://www.bloglines.com/" target="_blank">Bloglines</a><br />
which is one of the foremost news aggregation tools on the web and<br />
happens to be the database behind Ask Blogs and Feeds. To ensure that<br />
your blogs and feeds are included in this system I suggest creating an<br />
account at Bloglines and be sure to include your feed within the<br />
profile.</p>
<p>In order to have any chance of<br />
influencing your position within Ask Blogs and Feeds you need to be<br />
aware of a couple things. First, the order of results within Ask&#8217;s<br />
Blogs and Feeds is determined by a combination of Ask&#8217;s ExpertRank<br />
algorithm (their intensive search engine algorithm) and Blogline&#8217;s vast<br />
12 million plus blog database. Ask uses this combination to create the<br />
first order of results which is dictated by relevance; not by date<br />
which is the most common first viewing at Ask&#8217;s competitors.<br />
Consequently, it is important that you pay close attention to the<br />
relevance of the keyword density in your title, body and links within<br />
each post you write on your blog. By keeping your ideal keyword ranking<br />
in mind while writing your posts you will have a better chance of<br />
obtaining a ranking based on relevance.</p>
<p>Secondly,<br />
aside from ordering results by relevance and date (noted as &#8220;most<br />
recent&#8221;), Ask also offers a sorting by popularity. I can only postulate<br />
how this works but it makes good sense that a popularity ranking is<br />
derived from a mingling of Ask&#8217;s monitoring of the stickiness of<br />
certain articles (how long users stayed at an article before returning)<br />
and how many times a feed and/or a post is accessed within the<br />
multitude of user accounts at Bloglines. Considering these factors it<br />
stands to reason that creating a sticky blog post is the clearest and<br />
most obvious first requirement. The second requirement would be to get<br />
active in the Bloglines community and try to spread the word about your<br />
quality blog(s) throughout your community. The more people that add<br />
your blog feed to their Bloglines profile and interact with it, the<br />
better chance you have of achieving a top spot when results are ordered<br />
by popularity.</p>
<p>                  <br/>
<p><strong>ABOUT ASK MOBILE</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://m.ask.com/" target="_blank">Ask  Mobile</a><br />
utilizes ExpertRank and appears to be based on Ask&#8217;s standard website<br />
database. This may seem odd at first. After all, how can Ask provide<br />
mobile users with full size websites? The trick lies in their use of<br />
Skweezer technology that squeezes normally unwieldy websites into more<br />
digestible one column sites for mobile users. It may seem that there is<br />
nothing that can be done then to influence mobile rankings at Ask. Not<br />
true, the answer lies within the fact that Ask Mobile is focused on<br />
providing local results to cell users while they are on the go. With<br />
that in mind it makes sense that you improve your website&#8217;s odds of<br />
being found by ensuring it has a comprehensive listing in AskCity.</p>
<p><strong style="font-style: italic;">Tip!</strong><span style="font-style: italic;"> </span>If<br />
locally based results are extremely attractive to you then I also<br />
suggest adding your physical address information within the footer of<br />
every page so that Ask and other locally focused search engines have a<br />
better chance of associating your website with a region.</p>
<p><strong>SITEMAPS ARE CRITICAL</strong></p>
<p>Ask&#8217;s<br />
spider is the least active of the big 4 search by far. When reviewing<br />
client spider reports I see Ask visiting websites 50% less or more than<br />
MSN, Yahoo and Google. In fact on many websites that have not yet added<br />
a sitemap or have less than ideal site structures Ask often does not<br />
even index pages deep within their website(s). As a result, submitting<br />
a sitemap to Ask is critical if you want your deep content to be<br />
properly indexed.<br/>     </p>
<ol start="1" type="1">
<li>First create a       sitemap. On StepForth&#8217;s <a href="http://news.stepforth.com/tools/" target="_blank">recommended       SEO tools</a> page we noted our favourite tool currently: <a href="http://news.stepforth.com/tools/#sitemap" target="_blank">Vigos Google Sitemap       Generator</a>.<br />
Download this free utility and have it spider your website. Once it is<br />
complete set whatever custom data you want (info is provided within the<br />
program) and then generate the sitemap.xml file. Place this file within<br />
the root of your website and move to step 2.<br/>     </li>
<p><br/>
<li>To <a href="http://about.ask.com/en/docs/about/webmasters.shtml#22" target="_blank">submit your       sitemap to Ask</a><br />
you have two options: add a link to the sitemap into your Robots.txt<br />
file or simply inject your sitemap.xml address into the following URL<br />
and then visit it:<br/><br/>       <span style="color: rgb(51, 0, 255); font-family: Courier New,Courier,monospace;">http://submissions.ask.com/ping?sitemap=http%3A//www.the       URL of your sitemap here.xml</span><br/><br/><br />
Of the two options I strongly recommend going the route of adding the<br />
sitemap auto discovery link to your robots.txt file because this is now<br />
an agreed method of submitting a sitemap amongst the major search<br />
engines. Just place the following code on its own line within your<br />
robots.txt file:<br/><br/>       <span style="color: rgb(51, 0, 255); font-family: Courier New,Courier,monospace;">SITEMAP: http://www.the URL of your sitemap       here.xml</span></li>
</ol>
<p><strong>USING ASK AS A RESEARCH TOOL</strong></p>
<p>Ask<br />
has a helpful resource included in its universal search layout called<br />
&#8220;narrow your search&#8221;. Try typing in your keyphrase in Ask and then take<br />
a look at the narrow your search section of the page. There you will<br />
see popular searches that are relevant to your keyphrase. Record this<br />
information when conducting keyword research because it is a valuable<br />
glimpse into what Ask&#8217;s ExpertRank algorithm considers closely relevant<br />
and it may also show what users are actually searching for.</p>
<p><strong>OTHER INFORMATION</strong></p>
<p>There  are a few personality traits that you should be aware of when working with Ask  that are quite unique:<br/>     </p>
<ol start="1" type="1">
<li>Ask<br />
does not currently support the &#8220;nofollow&#8221; tag which could mean that any<br />
link leaving your website is considered a vote of confidence for the<br />
destination site.<br/>     </li>
<p><br/>
<li>Ask utilizes a site/content<br />
preview window for each listing it presents; represented by a binocular<br />
icon. Since users may use this tool to get a glimpse of your site<br />
before visiting it is more important than ever to ensure the content<br />
above the fold (that appears first without scrolling) is enticing to<br />
users and relevant to their search.</li>
</ol>
<p><strong>CONCLUSION</strong></p>
<p>I<br />
am solidly impressed by the technology at Ask and its successful foray<br />
into the realms of universal search. In fact, my research for this<br />
article has moved Ask from a bystander in my set of daily search tools<br />
to the forefront. I highly recommend utilizing Ask for your search<br />
needs and to keep an eye out for future technology additions to this<br />
solid search engine. In my opinion Ask is cutting edge enough that we<br />
can expect many search engines will be copying their successful<br />
implementations in the future. </p>
<p>Now&#8230; if only<br />
Ask could get the positive attention it deserves. If I were them I<br />
would start by creating a stronger connection with webmasters to<br />
interact with them and build awareness. That would be far more<br />
effective than the ad campaigns they are currently flooding the<br />
airwaves with.</p>
<p><strong><br/></strong></p>
<p>                  <strong></strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://isedb.com/20071011-1724.php/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How to Optimize for MSN!</title>
		<link>http://isedb.com/20070925-1716.php</link>
		<comments>http://isedb.com/20070925-1716.php#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 19:42:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ross Dunn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Search Engine Optimization]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.isedb.com/wp/?page_id=1716</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last week 
                    I discussed the best tactics for achieving rankings in Yahoo, 
                    the web&#8217;s number 2 most popular search engine. Now it 
                    is time to pick on the third most used search property &#8211; 
                    MSN, which has 6.6% of the search market (src: Hitwise) 
                    and is currently found at www.live.com. 
                    MSN&#8217;s ranking algorithm has its own nuances which will 
                    be noted in this article but in many cases the rules of optimization 
                    may be the same as Yahoo&#8217;s in which case I will occasionally 
                    duplicate information from my &#8220;How 
                    to Optimize for Yahoo&#8221; article or source 
                    it for more information.<br/> ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last week I discussed the best tactics for achieving rankings in Yahoo, the web&#8217;s number 2 most popular search engine. Now it is time to pick on the third most used search property &#8211; MSN, which has 6.6% of the search market (src: <a target="_blank" href="http://www.hitwise.com/datacenter/searchengineanalysis.php">Hitwise</a>) and is currently found at <a target="_blank" href="http://www.live.com/">www.live.com</a>. MSN&#8217;s ranking algorithm has its own nuances which will be noted in this article but in many cases the rules of optimization may be the same as Yahoo&#8217;s in which case I will occasionally duplicate information from my &#8220;<a href="http://www.isedb.com/db/articles/1712/1/How-to-Optimize-for-Yahoo/Page1.html">How to Optimize for Yahoo</a>&#8221; article or source it for more information.<br/><br/><br />
<h3>WEB SITE OPTIMIZATION</h3>
<p><br/>Except for the following elements, optimizing for MSN is identical to optimizing for Yahoo.<br/><br/><span style="font-weight: bold;">Fresh Content is King:</span> I suppose technically this is not an element of &#8216;optimization&#8217;, however, this article would not be worth its salt if I didn&#8217;t express how highly MSN regards fresh content. If your site is in a competitive marketplace and you are finding it difficult to get a leg up on your competitors in MSN then write original content in order to build up your site and reputation. MSN appears to elevate websites that regularly update their content and a blog is a great way to post this content for others to read and favour you with links. If you would like some information on how to get a blog up and running from start to finish then I suggest reading <a target="_blank" href="http://news.stepforth.com/blog/2007/05/stepforth-tutorial-blogs-101-part-1.php">Blogs 101</a>.<br/><br/><span style="font-weight: bold;">Themed structure: </span>this topic is identical to that of my Yahoo article, however, it is vital enough to mention it again. Construct your website using a themed structure where core site topics (themes) have their own unique section of the website to themselves. When the search engine spiders index the content within this section they will be given absolute clarity as to what the section is about. For more information see the example within the <a href="http://www.isedb.com/db/articles/1712/1/How-to-Optimize-for-Yahoo/Page1.html">Yahoo Optimization</a> article.<br/><br/>Basic optimization principles hold true: take out your SEO basics handbook and follow the rules when optimizing for MSN and you have done the best you can. Specifically focus on inline links (links to pages within sentences) and the use of heading tags to fortify rankings at MSN.<br/><br/>Navigation: pages with text navigation which lends itself to simpler and more relevant indexing are performing well.<br/><br/><br />
<h3>WEB SITE SUBMISSION</h3>
<p><br/>Unlike Google and Yahoo, MSN does not yet have a fully operational Webmaster Central for webmasters to submit sitemaps and to acquire insight into their website profile on MSN; it is <a target="_blank" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/livesearch/archive/2007/08/22/our-new-webmaster-portal-and-an-invitation-to-the-private-beta.aspx">currently</a> in private beta so it is not available yet. That said I feel that submitting a website sitemap is extremely important. Fortunately there are two known ways to get your sitemap submitted to MSN:<br/><br/><span style="font-weight: bold;">Option 1)</span> The best method for submitting your sitemap is by adding a sitemap reference in your Robots.txt file using the following format:<br/><br/>Sitemap: http://www.xyzname.com/sitemap.xml<br/><br/><span style="font-weight: bold;">Option 2) </span>A back-door strategy can be used to submit your sitemap to MSN through the news aggregation service called Moreover. To submit your sitemap substitute the bolded text with your own information in the following URL:<br/><a target="_blank" href="http://api.moreover.com/ping?u=http://www.xyzname.com/sitemap.xml">http://api.moreover.com/ping?u=http://www.xyzname.com/sitemap.xml</a><br/><br/><br />
<h3>LINK BUILDING</h3>
<p><br/>MSN places a great deal of weight on incoming links and does not appear to apply as many filters to the links that Google or Yahoo do. As a result, ethical or not, many link building strategies such as reciprocal link building and paid links appear to pay dividends.<br/><br/>It is also noteworthy that MSN&#8217;s spider is very active so any incoming links that you receive will often be spidered within a week. Furthermore, MSN&#8217;s link filtering systems are not as bogged down as the other search engines (less traffic perhaps?) so incoming links appear to affect rankings faster which tends to help when tweaking a campaign and measuring the value of links.<br/><br/><br />
<h3>CONCLUSION</h3>
<p><br/>As you can see there is little to report on the intricacies of optimizing for MSN because, quite frankly, MSN is fairly predictable and by the book; write good original content, optimize it well using the techniques outlined in the Yahoo optimization tutorial and ensure to submit your sitemap to MSN. If you combine those elements with a solid link building campaign then you are sure to move into a ranking where you can continue to tweak your optimization until you reach the top</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://isedb.com/20070925-1716.php/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How to Optimize for Yahoo!</title>
		<link>http://isedb.com/20070913-1712.php</link>
		<comments>http://isedb.com/20070913-1712.php#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2007 01:34:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ross Dunn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Search Engine Optimization]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.isedb.com/wp/?page_id=1712</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<font face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">With a 
                    reported 22.1% of search traffic Yahoo is second only to Google's 
                    64.4% (src: <a href="http://www.hitwise.com/datacenter/searchengineanalysis.php" target="_blank">Hitwise</a>) 
                    for search user volume so it is extremely important not to 
                    forget that attaining a top ranking in Yahoo can be a big 
                    boon to the bottom line. As a result, I decided to write this 
                    update on how to attain superior rankings in Yahoo using today's 
                    useful tools and tactics.</font> ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With a<br />
                    reported 22.1% of search traffic Yahoo is second only to Google&#8217;s<br />
                    64.4% (src: <a href="http://www.hitwise.com/datacenter/searchengineanalysis.php" target="_blank">Hitwise</a>)<br />
                    for search user volume so it is extremely important not to<br />
                    forget that attaining a top ranking in Yahoo can be a big<br />
                    boon to the bottom line. As a result, I decided to write this<br />
                    update on how to attain superior rankings in Yahoo using today&#8217;s<br />
                    useful tools and tactics.</p>
<p>OVERVIEW:<br />
                    Optimizing for Yahoo!<br/><br />
                    Algorithmically Yahoo is Google&#8217;s much younger sibling.<br />
                    I say this because many of the requirements for a successful<br />
                    ranking mirror Google&#8217;s requirement about 4 years ago<br />
                    and they sum up to one distinct fact; optimize your content<br />
                    boldly on Yahoo and you will be rewarded. When I say &#8220;boldly&#8221;<br />
                    I do not mean use SPAM; by nature SPAM and optimization do<br />
                    not mix&#8230; they are two entirely separate concepts (black<br />
                    and white in fact). </p>
<p>The following<br />
                    are the current generalized specifications for achieving solid<br />
                    rankings in Yahoo.</p>
<h3>WEB<br />
                    SITE OPTIMIZATION</h3>
<p>
                    SEO tactics have not changed a great deal over the past 10<br />
                    years I have been an SEO. In general terms the only effect<br />
                    time has had on SEO is to vary the intensity of the optimization<br />
                    for particular page elements. That is the rub of course; some<br />
                    search engines appreciate the optimization of particular page<br />
                    elements over others. In the case of Yahoo, this old property<br />
                    with a relatively young algorithm tends to favour the following<br />
                    elements:</p>
<p>Title<br />
                    Tag: Keep your title tag as short as 5 small-medium<br />
                    sized words and include one complete incidence of your keyphrase.<br />
                    Yahoo! blatantly favours sites that include the keyphrase<br />
                    in the title tag. For an example check out &#8220;<a href="http://search.yahoo.com/search;_ylt=A0geu9MO4eZGAAcAH7dXNyoA?p=car%2Bsales&#038;y=Search&#038;fr=yfp-t-471&#038;fp_ip=CA&#038;rd=r1&#038;meta=vc%3Dca" target="_blank">car<br />
                    sales</a>&#8221; or for that matter any phrase. Within the<br />
                    top 10 results you will notice that the majority of sites<br />
                    listed will include at least one incidence of the keyphrase<br />
                    or a crucial portion of it (i.e. &#8220;cars&#8221;). The<br />
                    ones that do not include the keyphrase tend to be sites that<br />
                    have are extremely popular so even basic title tag optimization<br />
                    is not required to attain a top ranking.</p>
<p>Meta<br />
                    Description Tag: Start this tag with an incidence<br />
                    of your keyphrase and then produce a short 15 &#8211; 18 small-medium<br />
                    sized word sentence clearly describing your site. Include<br />
                    one more incidence of your keyphrase in the sentence. Keep<br />
                    in mind that the description tag is often utilized as the<br />
                    description for any rankings you achieve so it is best to<br />
                    make it alluring. </p>
<p>Meta<br />
                    Keyword Tag: Keyword tags have long been considered<br />
                    ineffective and no longer have any importance on Google; however<br />
                    Yahoo does still consider the keyword tag so it cannot hurt<br />
                    to include it. The keyword tag should start with the keyphrase<br />
                    and then all following words or phrases should be ordered<br />
                    according to their relevance to your website; place the most<br />
                    important ones up front. The max size of a keyword tag should<br />
                    be 250 characters &#8211; comma-delimited. Do not over repeat<br />
                    words; no more than 3 repetitions of a single word within<br />
                    the tag.</p>
<p>Keywords<br />
                    in URL: Create keyword-based filenames that closely<br />
                    represent the content within the file. Yahoo rewards keyword-based<br />
                    filenames a small amount &#8211; perhaps enough to push past<br />
                    your competition.</p>
<p>Headings:<br />
                    Heading 1 and 2 tags should be applied on every page<br />
                    where appropriate to embolden the relevance of the page. In<br />
                    other words, use the page&#8217;s keyphrase within a Heading<br />
                    1 tag to further enhance the visibility of the keyphrase on<br />
                    the page.</p>
<p>Alt<br />
                    text for images: Don&#8217;t forget to provide appropriate<br />
                    ALT text for each image on your website. The ALT text must<br />
                    not provide information that is already written on the website.<br />
                    ALT text is supposed to provide a clear and concise description<br />
                    of what the image is. Fortunately this means that adding an<br />
                    incidence of the keyphrase or a portion of the keyphrase is<br />
                    totally appropriate which can add slightly more credibility<br />
                    to your page score when Yahoo&#8217;s crawler (Slurp) indexes<br />
                    the page.</p>
<p>Inline<br />
                    Links: In the midst of your page it is beneficial<br />
                    to include links to related pages from related content. These<br />
                    links will apply relevance to the linked page; which is optimized<br />
                    for the same keyphrase you linked from.</p>
<p>Site<br />
                    Structure: Site structure is a vital component to<br />
                    ranking success on Yahoo; especially in competitive marketplaces<br />
                    where every advantage is required to reach the top. One method<br />
                    that would be successful at Yahoo (and happens to work as<br />
                    well on the other major search engines) is a tried and true<br />
                    technique that revolves around the linear progression of related<br />
                    content throughout the website; it is commonly known as Themeing.<br />
                    The following example should shed some light on this subject:</p>
<p>Your site<br />
                    is a car sales site focused on Audi. In order to create a<br />
                    linear site structure you would focus each section of the<br />
                    site on an individual relevancy. Say you pick &#8220;Audi<br />
                    A5&#8243; as the relevant topic (see Figure 1.0). As you move<br />
                    deeper into the Audi A5 section you only see A5 relevant content.<br />
                    The search engine spider and your users will not be distracted<br />
                    by links to other vehicles &#8211; only information on the<br />
                    A5. This progresses as you proceed deeper into this arm of<br />
                    the website and because this section of the site is utterly<br />
                    focused on the subject &#8220;Audi A5&#8243; the odds of achieving<br />
                    a ranking for that term increase considerably.</p>
<p align="center">
                    <img title="" alt="" src="http://www.isedb.com/db/content_images/1/site-structure-diagram.jpg" align="" border="0" height="149" width="423"/>
                  </p>
<h3>LINKS</h3>
<p>
                    When building links for Yahoo concentrate on quality not quantity.<br />
                    Quality links would be one way links from sites that specialize<br />
                    in content directly relevant to the content on your own website.<br />
                    Building these links can be done by creating content and syndicating<br />
                    it to your own industry for link love and to build credibility.<br />
                    In addition, if your website is a worthwhile resource it is<br />
                    entirely reasonable to tell the world about your site in order<br />
                    to build links; hopefully they will link to you because they<br />
                    like your site so much. Finally, there is another tactic that<br />
                    has mixed results; send out press releases once a month using<br />
                    PRWeb or an associated press release agency. A good press<br />
                    release can easily build the links you need in no time at<br />
                    all. Unfortunately the mixed results I noted occur when press<br />
                    releases inevitably become archived, at which point the link<br />
                    relevance will fade. As a result, link building with press<br />
                    releases is only useful as an ongoing practice and should<br />
                    be considered a small facet of a robust link building campaign.</p>
<p><br/></p>
<h3>
                    SITE EXPLORER SETTINGS</h3>
<p>
                    <a href="http://siteexplorer.search.yahoo.com/" target="_blank">Yahoo&#8217;s<br />
                    Site Explorer</a> is a fantastic tool for monitoring your<br />
                    website(s) and running basic link reports. If you have not<br />
                    already done so you should create an account at Site Explorer<br />
                    and then validate your website (prove you own it) so that<br />
                    you can manage the information Yahoo has for your website.<br />
                    Once you have validated your website I have noted some Site<br />
                    Explorer functionality that may help your website perform<br />
                    on Yahoo:</p>
<ul>
<li>Make<br />
                      certain to create a sitemap and submit it to Yahoo<br/><br />
                      If you haven&#8217;t already done so use a XML<br />
                      sitemap generator to create a sitemap for your website<br />
                      and then submit it to Yahoo using the &#8220;Add Feed&#8221;<br />
                      form within your website&#8217;s Site Explorer profile.<br />
                      <br/>
                      </li>
<li>Removing<br />
                      unnecessary dynamic content from your URLs with new add-on<br />
                      within Site Explorer<br/><br />
                      Does your URLs content session ID&#8217;s or other dynamic<br />
                      content that is unnecessary within the URL? If so, this<br />
                      information can be indexed by the search engines and ultimately<br />
                      can cause havoc with your rankings. Thankfully Yahoo has<br />
                      implemented a new tool within the Site Explorer domain management<br />
                      section called &#8220;Dynamic URLs Beta&#8221;. Here are<br />
                      <a href="http://help.yahoo.com/l/us/yahoo/search/siteexplorer/dynamic/index.html" target="_blank">the<br />
                      instructions</a> to use the Dynamic URLs tool.</li>
</ul>
<p><br/>
                    </p>
<h3>OTHER CONSIDERATIONS</h3>
<p>
                    After reviewing our notes from current and previous Yahoo<br />
                    promotions and taking a look at a variety of top 10 results<br />
                    the following points appeared noteworthy:</p>
<ul>
<li>Ensure<br />
                      open indexing by using Robots.txt wisely<br/>
                      </li>
<li>A lot<br />
                      of our client&#8217;s older content appears to be sticking<br />
                      to top rankings with little or no monthly tweaking. As a<br />
                      result, I think it is fair to assume that fresh content<br />
                      is not currently gaining much weight in the Yahoo algorithm.<br/>
                      </li>
<li> In<br />
                      many cases top ranking sites have pushed the envelope and<br />
                      their sites border on SPAM. Considering the top ranking<br />
                      these sites have it appears Yahoo&#8217;s SPAM filters are<br />
                      far less sensitive than Google&#8217;s. I expect Yahoo will<br />
                      change this in the near future but then again I have been<br />
                      surprised how long this has been the status quo.<br/>
                      </li>
<li>One<br />
                      common claim throughout forums is that achieving a placement<br />
                      in the Yahoo Directory provides an instant boost to Yahoo<br />
                      rankings. Unfortunately we have not seen conclusive evidence<br />
                      that the annual $299 fee will increase rankings dramatically<br />
                      in the short term. That said, I strongly believe that a<br />
                      Yahoo Directory placement is a very reputable incoming link<br />
                      that does pay dividends in the long run at any search engine<br />
                      that weighs incoming links (the ones that count).<br/>
                      </li>
<li><a href="http://searchmarketing.yahoo.com/srchsb/index.php" target="_blank">Yahoo<br />
                      Search Submit</a> was re-introduced<br />
                      back in February 2007 to significant<br />
                      criticism due to the potential favouritism to those<br />
                      who pay to get into the Yahoo index. Despite the negative<br />
                      feedback there appears to be some potential benefits to<br />
                      paying for submission. For one, in July I noted an interesting<br />
                      story where a website was banned from Yahoo and the webmaster<br />
                      got the site back into Yahoo&#8217;s index by paying for<br />
                      inclusion (&#8220;Banned<br />
                      from Yahoo?&#8221;). A second reason Search Submit may<br />
                      be worthwhile is the guarantee that your site will be indexed.<br />
                      Furthermore, the Yahoo&#8217;s Search Submit Pro service<br />
                      allows you to recommend your own title and description tags<br />
                      for each page submitted and to submit pages that may not<br />
                      normally be indexed by Slurp.</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://isedb.com/20070913-1712.php/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How Search Integrates as a Brand Vehicle</title>
		<link>http://isedb.com/20070825-1704.php</link>
		<comments>http://isedb.com/20070825-1704.php#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Aug 2007 12:25:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ross Dunn</dc:creator>
		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.isedb.com/wp/?page_id=1704</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well I am at Search Engine Strategies San Jose; the weather is
beautiful, the company great and the discussions so far excellent. The
following are point form notes from an interesting seminar
that discussed how search can be used to aid in branding instead of
just as a direct response sales vehicle. Each point, stat or anecdote
is in itself intriguing but overall add up to a helpful overview of how
to use search to brand. Please brace yourself, however, this discussion
went to many edges of the marketing universe so this post will have
gems from many disciplines.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well I am at Search Engine Strategies San Jose; the weather is<br />
beautiful, the company great and the discussions so far excellent. The<br />
following are point form notes from <a href="http://www.searchenginestrategies.com/sew/sj07/agenda.html#cz_2">an interesting seminar</a><br />
that discussed how search can be used to aid in branding instead of<br />
just as a direct response sales vehicle. Each point, stat or anecdote<br />
is in itself intriguing but overall add up to a helpful overview of how<br />
to use search to brand. Please brace yourself, however, this discussion<br />
went to many edges of the marketing universe so this post will have<br />
gems from many disciplines.<br/><br/>
<ul>
<li><span style="font-weight: bold;">URLs vs Name Brand:</span><br />
the big advertisements are more often recommending prospects search for<br />
their name online rather than provide a URL. This is because a high<br />
percentage (sorry can&#8217;t remember the #) of prospects cannot remember<br />
the URL later but have little problem remembering the brand.<br/><br/></li>
<li><span style="font-weight: bold;">Cover Your Assets: </span>When<br />
advertising offline make certain to buy paid placements for the many<br />
potential misspellings from your campaign. This recommendation also<br />
includes purchasing the applicable misspellings of the campaign URL for<br />
those that use it. If you fail to cover these gaps you can lose a<br />
substantial number of potential buyers.<br/><br/></li>
<li><span style="font-weight: bold;">The Special K Campaign: </span>One<br />
of the speakers noted a branding campaign that many of us likely<br />
witnessed during the 2006 Christmas/New Years season by Kellogs. The<br />
concept of the popular TV commercial was that Special K wanted to help<br />
you in your bid to become healthier. The crossover to the Internet<br />
occurred when anyone typed in &#8220;Special K&#8221; into Yahoo (who was a<br />
participant in this campaign) they were provided with a co-branded<br />
customized search result page that provided targeted routes for users.<br />
One such route was to a forum area where users could get help and ask<br />
questions about their bid to get healthier. The other was a co-branded<br />
tips section where there was plenty of advice on snack eating,<br />
associated diets, food myths, etc.<br/><br/>So what does this branding<br />
campaign demonstrate? Special K took an approach that is now the spirit<br />
of social marketing; they were not directly asking people to buy<br />
Special K but they were building credibility for their brand by<br />
partnering with their prospects in their bid to get healthier.<br />
Brilliant!<br/><br/></li>
<li><span style="font-weight: bold;">A Funny Bit About Contextual: </span>I<br />
have never been a big fan of contextual advertising so when the search<br />
agency representatives on the panel were asked how they felt contextual<br />
worked into their marketing plans I perked up. What I heard made me<br />
grin ear to ear&#8230; the panelists seemed a bit perplexed for a moment<br />
and then in their own turn essentially said contextual advertising was<br />
only considered with any money that was left in a campaign. In other<br />
words&#8230;. forget about it unless you have some pennies to spare and you<br />
want to really blanket the world.<br/><br/></li>
<li><span style="font-weight: bold;">How will the growth of universal search affect paid search marketing?:</span><br />
I was surprised by the answer to this question. Essentially the agency<br />
panelists agreed that universal search could be bad for paid<br />
advertising. The reason they cited was the more accurate organic search<br />
becomes the less likely it is that searchers will act on paid<br />
advertisements. I was surprised more by their candor than anything. In<br />
my opinion they are entirely correct which is why I firmly believe that<br />
organic search engine optimization is a key component to every online<br />
marketing campaign.<br/><br/></li>
<li><span style="font-weight: bold;">Yahoo Universal Search: </span>Yahoo<br />
representative Kelly Graziadei noted that Yahoo is currently testing<br />
various forms of universal search within its results. One such example<br />
can be seen by searching for &#8220;Transformers&#8221;. In this instance Yahoo has<br />
decided to keep the top 10 organic rankings intact but they have<br />
preceded them with a graphic enticing viewers to check out the movie<br />
trailer to the popular movie or see reviews and find show times in<br />
their zip code.<br/><br/></li>
<li><span style="font-weight: bold;">Local Better than International: </span>Scott<br />
Linzer, Director of Search Marketing at Universal McCann loosely noted<br />
that the campaigns which made the more time consuming foray into<br />
creating locally targeted campaigns experienced a better bang for their<br />
advertising dollar in contrast to the more common national approach.<br/><br/></li>
<li><span style="font-weight: bold;">PPC and Organic are a Logical Pairing:</span><br />
both of the agency advocates noted that even after achieving a #1<br />
ranking for a specific term there are direct benefits to continuing<br />
with a paid campaign for the very same term. To back this up they<br />
stressed the benefit of multiple locations for branding but they made<br />
an additional point that I thought very logical: the content within<br />
paid advertisements are easier to control and to revise to improve<br />
clickthroughs than organic rankings currently are.<br/><br/></li>
<li><span style="font-weight: bold;">What is a Reasonable Conversion Percentage?: </span>I<br />
asked Scott Linzer this question and his response was that 2 percent<br />
was a reasonable conversion expectation for a paid campaign. Any lower<br />
than 2 percent requires serious scrutiny and continued testing. Of<br />
course, I expect no one ever stops testing. I should note that the<br />
company Scott works for, Universal McCann, handles a great deal of<br />
Microsoft&#8217;s paid advertising so I was happy to get his opinion on this<br />
question.</li>
</ul>
<p>There you are ladies and gentlemen. I will have more<br />
to come on Wednesday. For now I am signing off and preparing for the<br />
next day of fun. All the best, Ross Dunn.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://isedb.com/20070825-1704.php/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tips for Optimizing Blogs and Feeds</title>
		<link>http://isedb.com/20070825-1703.php</link>
		<comments>http://isedb.com/20070825-1703.php#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Aug 2007 12:20:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ross Dunn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Search Engine Optimization]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.isedb.com/wp/?page_id=1703</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I caught an interesting seminar today called "SEO Through Blogs and Feeds"
with Stephen Spencer, Rick Klau, Doug Hay and Greg Jarboe on the panel.
The following are my point by point notes that stood out as noteworthy.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I caught an interesting seminar today called &#8220;<a href="http://www.searchenginestrategies.com/sew/sj07/agenda3.html#organic_1" target="_blank">SEO Through Blogs and Feeds</a>&#8221;<br />
with Stephen Spencer, Rick Klau, Doug Hay and Greg Jarboe on the panel.<br />
The following are my point by point notes that stood out as noteworthy.<br />
Some of these tips are mirrored in my 3 part <a href="http://news.stepforth.com/blog/2007/05/stepforth-tutorial-blogs-101-part-1.php" target="_blank">tutorial on blogging called Blogs 101</a> but as always some great new tips popped up.<br/><br/><span style="font-weight: bold;">Key Tips</span><br/>For<br />
those in a rush or who have already read my blogs 101 article the<br />
following tips are very worthwhile reading &#8211; if just for their<br />
importance as reminders:<br/><br/>
<ul>
<li>It is extremely important that<br />
RSS auto-discovery tags be placed in the header of every page within a<br />
website that has feeds available. By doing so you will provide users<br />
and search engines alike with a simple method of being notified that<br />
you have RSS feed(s) and it will allow immediate subscription without<br />
fuss. In contrast simply having a RSS logo hyperlinked with a feed<br />
provides little or no benefit and does not provide auto-notification<br />
that a feed is available.<br/><br/>Furthermore it is recommended to<br />
create a unique auto-discovery tag for each available RSS feed and<br />
place them all in the header. If you think you have too many then I<br />
would recommend choosing the feeds that are most relevant to the page<br />
content.<br/><br/></li>
<li>A WordPress plugin was noted called the &#8220;<a href="http://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/seo-title-tag/" target="_blank">SEO Title Tag Plugin</a>&#8220;.<br />
This plugin really impressed me because it allows WordPress users to<br />
see and individually customize the title tags of every post within the<br />
associated blog; without a doubt a powerful capability since title tags<br />
play a significant role in rankings.<br/><br/></li>
<li>If you use paid<br />
Press Release services to disseminate your latest company news then it<br />
also works to your advantage to create a separate blog specifically<br />
used for your press releases. In this regard you can use the associated<br />
RSS feed to get some free publicity by submitting it to blog<br />
directories and other blog-syndicating properties.<br/><br/></li>
<li>If<br />
you are finding it difficult to get the word out about a particular<br />
piece of news then Greg Jarboe has a great idea for you: track down the<br />
key bloggers that appear to be driving the news in your industry and<br />
contact them with your story.<br/><br/>If your story interests even one<br />
of the bloggers and gets published then you could get a massive amount<br />
of publicity for zero dollars.<br/><br/>During the presentation of this concept Greg Jarboe utilized a powerful online tool called <a href="http://www.buzzlogic.com/" target="_blank">BuzzLogic</a><br />
to identify which people drove the latest news in key topics.<br />
Unfortunately BuzzLogic appears to be priced well out of the<br />
capabilities of many small businesses (at $12,000/yr minimum) so I will<br />
provide a very basic free alternative to determining the leaders of a<br />
particular topic.<br/><br/><span style="font-style: italic;">Step 1)</span><br />
Search in your favorite search engine for the particular topic. Within<br />
the results separate the blogs from the other content. If you do not<br />
find at least 10 bloggers then try search again with different wording<br />
for the same topic.<br/><br/><span style="font-style: italic;">Step 2) </span>Look<br />
at each blog individually and look for indications of readership or<br />
popularity. For example perhaps one of the website has a Feedburner<br />
subscription counter with the blog&#8217;s current readership OR take the URL<br />
of the blog and conduct a backlink check on Yahoo using &#8220;linkdomain:www.<site>.com&#8221; (without the quotes) to see which blogs have the most inbound links. Sort these blogs according to their popularity.<br/><br/><span style="font-style: italic;">Step 3)</span><br />
Find contact information on each site and then contact the writer(s)<br />
starting with the most trafficked blogs and pitch your news/idea/story.<br/><br/>Note:<br />
I am not saying the steps above have anywhere near the quality of<br />
results that a full-fledge program like BuzzLogic has but it is<br />
certainly a great place to start.<br/><br/></site></li>
<li>Promote your<br />
latest blog posting by taking advantage of a popular blogger&#8217;s vanity.<br />
Compliment them within your key article (somehow) using their full name<br />
and perhaps provide a link back to their website. Chances are that the<br />
blogger often keeps an eye on blog postings or sites that utilize their<br />
name. When they visit your posting there is a good chance they will<br />
read it.<br/></li>
</ul>
<p><br/><span style="font-weight: bold;">General Blog and Feed Optimization Tips:</span><br/>
<ol>
<li>Providing<br />
full text feeds was noted regularly throughout the presentation as a<br />
far superior method for creating backlinks and getting found online.</li>
<li>Your blog feed should have 20 or more items never the minimum 10.</li>
<li>Provide a feed for every category your site/blog offers.</li>
<li>Ensure that you create keyword rich blog posts and ensure that your brand is well represented within the text.</li>
<li>Ensure the most important keyword/phrase is listed in the blog title.<br/><br/></li>
</ol>
<p><span style="font-weight: bold;">Optimize Your Blog&#8217;s Linking Structure For Best Results</span><br/>
<ol>
<li>Provide<br />
a listing of the top 10 posts within your site so the stories do not<br />
get buried in archives or category pages. If the articles are<br />
performing well it is just logical to keep them in plain view to get<br />
more mileage from them.</li>
<li>Use Tag Clouds and Tag Pages to increase the possible routes to your valuable past content.</li>
<li>If you are using WordPress as your blogging tool it is a great idea to install the &#8220;<a href="http://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/wp-sticky/#post-380" target="_blank">Sticky Posts&#8221; plugin</a> which allows you to &#8216;stick&#8217; an introduction or key post at the top of each category page.<br/><br/></li>
</ol>
<p><span style="font-weight: bold;">Addressing Blog Duplication Concerns</span><br/>By<br />
opening up categories (a.k.a. &#8216;labels&#8217; on Blogger) to the search<br />
engines you increase the likelihood of having a great deal of<br />
duplicated content. Fortunately the search engines have, so far, been<br />
quite clear that duplicate content in blogs is not a concern because it<br />
is a natural consequence of labeling. That said, there was a WordPress<br />
plugin noted that would allow you to create controlled article excerpts<br />
(or teasers) within the category pages. It is called &#8220;Optional<br />
Excerpts&#8221; and by using it you can maintain the authority of the core<br />
posting since the label pages will only provide a teaser versus the<br />
full text of the article.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://isedb.com/20070825-1703.php/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Summarized SEO Tips from SMX Advanced &#8211; Part 2</title>
		<link>http://isedb.com/20070615-1669.php</link>
		<comments>http://isedb.com/20070615-1669.php#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2007 04:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ross Dunn</dc:creator>
		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.isedb.com/wp/?page_id=1669</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ross Dunn provides readers with a concise list of the news and tips that really stood out from the rest. In <a href="http://www.isedb.com/db/articles/1667/1/Summarized-SEO-Tips-from-SMX-Advanced---Part-1/Summarized-SEO-Tips-from-SMX-Advanced---Part-1.html">part one of the SMX Advanced summary</a> he discussed duplicate content issues and some other tips that deserved immediate attention. In part two, he will tackle tips for efficient marketing and SEO and a list of the top SEO tools including.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The SMX Advanced conference was jam-packed with info that I know many site owners and webmasters who could not make the show are dying to see. There have been a large number of summaries published from other attendees including those who blogged in real time; great resources for truly detailed reports. In my case, I want to provide StepForth readers with a concise list of the news and tips that really stood out from the rest. In <a href="http://www.isedb.com/db/articles/1667/1/Summarized-SEO-Tips-from-SMX-Advanced---Part-1/Summarized-SEO-Tips-from-SMX-Advanced---Part-1.html">part one</a> of the SMX Advanced summary I discussed duplicate content issues and some other tips that I felt deserved immediate attention. In part two, I will tackle tips for efficient marketing and search engine optimization and a list of the top SEO tools including my own favorites.<br/><br/><br/><strong><span>Tips for Efficient Marketing and Search Engine Optimization</span><br/></strong>I loved this seminar! There was a whole host of SEOs on the panel that I really respect and it is always great to hear about new tips for speeding up the process of SEO &#8211; or at least to make the work more accurate. Here are some of the tips supplemented slightly with my own feedback.<br/><br/></p>
<ul>
<li><span>Cost Effective Promotions:</span> Socially promote your website and build links using interns. It is a great way to affordably promote a company and train potential long-term employees. After all, the interns will get to know your brand very well and become extremely familiar with the social marketing avenues.
</li>
<li><span>Accurate Keyword Analysis:</span> Where accuracy is absolutely vital (most cases), when conducting keyword analysis you should check to make certain that your keyword data is consistent across multiple research tools such as Keyword Discovery, WordTracker, Yahoo Keyword Suggestion Tool, MSN Adlabs, Google Adwords Keyword Tool, etc. This is especially important when you are suspicious of the keyword order from a specific provider. Note that <a href="http://adlab.msn.com/" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">MSN Adlabs</a> was a tip within itself at the conference; it offers a wonderful toolset! (Google please copy this!).
</li>
<li><span>Write Headlines that Work:</span> One of the presenters (I think it was Danny Sullivan) recommended reading an excellent article by the New York Times called &#8220;<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2006/04/09/weekinreview/09lohr.html?ex=1302235200&#038;en=fd2082be97aa034d&#038;ei=5088&#038;partner=rssnyt&#038;emc=rss" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">This Boring Headline is Written for Google</a>&#8221; which gives valuable insight into how headlines that work in print and on web differ so greatly. Here is an excerpt that sets the tone of the article: &#8220;Part of the craft of journalism for more than a century has been to think up clever titles and headlines, and Google comes along and says, &#8216;The heck with that,&#8217; &#8220;observed Ed Canale, vice president for strategy and new media at The Sacramento Bee.
</li>
<li><span>Go Google Local or You&#8217;re Loco:</span> Getting a free local listing with Google should be a no-brainer for everyone because it can provide your company with a free listing above all other organic listings. For example, just type in &#8220;<a href="http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&#038;rlz=1B3GGGL_enCA216&#038;q=victoria+bc+tours&#038;btnG=Search" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">Victoria BC tours</a>&#8221; on Google and you will see the first 3 rankings are local. These rankings were free and I am sure have paid off immensely by usurping the official organic rankings by 3 crucial positions. For more info learn <a href="http://news.stepforth.com/2006-news/google-maps.shtml" target="_blank">how to add your company for free in Google Local</a>.<br/></li>
</ul>
<p><strong><span>Excellent SEO &#038; SMM Research Tools</span><br/></strong>The SEO panel provided a few examples of the great widgets and applications they use to make their life easier. Here are a few, including my own favorites:<br/></p>
<ul>
<li><span><a href="http://www.serph.com/" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">SERPH</a>:</span> track the &#8216;buzz&#8217; of yourself and your competitors using this handy social search tool
</li>
<li><span><a href="http://tools.seobook.com/firefox/seo-for-firefox.html" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">SEO for Firefox</a>:</span> a great plugin from SEO Book
</li>
<li><span><a href="http://home.snafu.de/tilman/xenulink.html" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">XENU Link Sleuth</a>:</span> a popular tool for many SEOs, XENU can quickly analyze your own or a competitor&#8217;s site.
</li>
<li><span><a href="http://www.groowe.com/" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">Groowe Search Toolbar</a>:</span> install this toolbar and you will have access to at least 10 search engine bars within one application.<br/><span>Note: Here is where the SMX tips stop and my personal recommendations begin.</span>
</li>
<li><span><a href="http://www.compete.com/" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">Compete</a>: </span>this great free tool can provide a statistical comparison of up to 5 different websites. Excellent for competitor analysis.
</li>
<li><span><a href="http://www.alexa.com/" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">Alexa</a>:</span> Alexa is the granddaddy of sources for competitor analysis data. Check out your own website&#8217;s profile and see where it stands in comparison to your competitors.
</li>
<li><span><a href="http://oy-oy.eu/site/www-or-not/" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">WWW or Not?</a>:</span> Is link popularity split between two versions of a domain name (i.e. http://domain.com vs http://www.domain.com)? If so, this tool will tell you. This is valuable if you want to see if your own website has extra link popularity sitting on the sidelines from other sites that have linked to the &#8216;wrong&#8217; address. Learn how to <a href="http://www.stepforth.com/faq/non-www-redirect.htm" target="_blank">fix this situation for your website</a>.
</li>
<li><span><a href="http://www.prprowler.com/" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">PR Prowler</a>:</span> although PageRank is not nearly as transparent as it once was PR Prowler is serves as a helpful method for finding the best sites to get links from or to advertise on.
</li>
<li><span><a href="http://www.seoconsultants.com/tools/headers.asp" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">Check Server Headers Tool</a>:</span> although slightly technical this tool, provided free by SEOConsultants.com provides valuable insight into the setup of yours or your competitor&#8217;s servers. For example, StepForth uses this tool to verify that our clients have properly set up their server redirects (301&#8242;s) so that duplicate content issues are avoided. It is also used extensively within our competitor analysis reports; it is useful to see how your competitors might have an edge over you.
</li>
<li><span><a href="http://www.domaintools.com/" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">DomainTools.com</a>:</span> Domain Tools is one of my favorite sites for competitor analysis. The most useful component, the <a href="http://www.domaintools.com/reverse-ip/">Reverse IP Tool</a>, allows me to plunk in a single competitor&#8217;s domain and then see every other website that is hosted on its server. In rare instances where the co-hosted domains are owned by the competitor I can get a hint at any future marketing plans my clients should be made aware of.
</li>
<li><span><a href="http://tool.motoricerca.info/robots-checker.phtml" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">Robots.txt Syntax Checker</a>: </span>There is nothing worse than making an error in a Robots.txt file and accidentally dropping a site out of the search engines. The free Robots.txt checker will review your Robots.txt file; ensuring it is properly created and it will provide you with the rules within the file in plain language to ensure everything meets your approval. This is a valuable tool for avoiding serious indexing issues.<br/></li>
</ul>
<p><strong><span>More to Come!</span><br/></strong>I can&#8217;t believe how much info I have to write about from SMX and the latest related news! As I write down more information about SMX I come up with my own ideas and comments so this series is going to span at least one more article. I hope you are enjoying it. Next we will discuss Social Media Marketing.<br/><br/></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://isedb.com/20070615-1669.php/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

